Hi, > From: rjwyso...@gmail.com [mailto:rjwyso...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Rafael J. Wysocki > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:31 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to > tables.c > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, Rafael > > Hi, > > >> From: Zheng, Lv > >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to > >> tables.c > >> > >> This patch moves acpi_os_table_override() and > >> acpi_os_physical_table_override() to tables.c. > >> > > [cut] > > >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE > >> -void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size); > >> +void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size); > >> #else > >> -static inline void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size) > >> +static inline void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size) > >> { > >> } > >> #endif > > [Lv Zheng] > > This block was wrong. > > early_acpi_table_init() is no longer dependent on > CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE but dependent on CONFIG_ACPI. > > I see. > > > Updated v2 patches are sent to the mailing list. > > Is this the only difference between v1 and v2?
[Lv Zheng] One of the follow-up patches (PATCH 3) in this series is updated accordingly. Thanks and best regards -Lv
