At Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:37:59 +0100,
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> Am Freitag, 12. Januar 2007 18:42 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:49:57 +0100,
> > Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > 
> > > + } else {
> > > +          if (idx < snd_ecards_limit) {
> > > +                 if (snd_cards_lock & (1 << idx))
> > > +                         err = -EBUSY;   /* invalid */
> > > +         } else if (idx < SNDRV_CARDS)
> > > +                         snd_ecards_limit = idx + 1; /* increase the 
> > > limit */
> > > +                 else
> > > +                         err = -ENODEV;
> > 
> > The indent looks strange in the above three lines.
> > Also, for me it's not much better than before... :)
> > (all if's are comparisons of idx with other values.)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> OK, how about this one? The original indentation makes the control
> flow very hard to follow.
> 
>       Regards
>               Oliver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks, now applied to ALSA tree.


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to