On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:01:03AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> 
> Fix a few trivial things based on review comments.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> 
> diff -puN kernel/rcupreempt.c~rcu-fix-trivials kernel/rcupreempt.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/kernel/rcupreempt.c~rcu-fix-trivials     
> 2007-01-15 15:37:00.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcupreempt.c     2007-01-15 
> 15:37:00.000000000 +0530
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void __rcu_read_lock(void)
>               local_irq_save(oldirq);
> 
>               /*
> -              * Outermost nesting of rcu_read_lock(), so atomically
> +              * Outermost nesting of rcu_read_lock(), so
>                * increment the current counter for the current CPU.
>                */
>               idx = rcu_ctrlblk.completed & 0x1;
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void __rcu_read_lock(void)
>                * Now that the per-CPU counter has been incremented, we
>                * are protected.  We can therefore safely increment
>                * the nesting counter, relieving further NMIs of the
> -              * need to do so.
> +              * need to increment the per-CPU counter.
>                */
>               current->rcu_read_lock_nesting = nesting + 1;
>               barrier();
> 
> _
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to