On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:11:46PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote: > This patch updates the driver to support 64-bit DMA > addressing. > > Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <[email protected]> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt | 3 +- > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-xilinx.c | 38 > ++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt > index 47b4e39..d417872 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt > @@ -7,12 +7,13 @@ Required properties: > - interrupts : Should contain single irq line of USB2 device > controller > - xlnx,has-builtin-dma : if DMA is included > - > +- xlnx,addrwidth : Should be the dma addressing size in bits(ex: 40 > bits).
Now this property shows up in a 2nd device. Now I'm more convinced this is the wrong approach and should use dma-ranges. Rob
