On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:15:57PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 21:33 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > Are you aware that your patch for safe attribute file removal provokes a
> > lockdep warning at bootup?
>
> Yes, I am aware of that. However, the top down lock order is always
> followed. A patch to make the lock checker realize that has been posted
> and included upstream.
Alan, here's the patch:
Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/fs/sysfs/inode.c b/fs/sysfs/inode.c
index 8c533cb..3b5574b 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/inode.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static inline void orphan_all_buffers(st
struct sysfs_buffer_collection *set = node->i_private;
struct sysfs_buffer *buf;
- mutex_lock(&node->i_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&node->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
if (node->i_private) {
list_for_each_entry(buf, &set->associates, associates) {
down(&buf->sem);
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ int sysfs_hash_and_remove(struct dentry
return -ENOENT;
parent_sd = dir->d_fsdata;
- mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
list_for_each_entry(sd, &parent_sd->s_children, s_sibling) {
if (!sd->s_element)
continue;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
