pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry uses ffs which gives bit indices
ranging from 1 to MAX. This leads to a corner case where we try to request
the pin number = MAX and fails.
bit_pos value is being calculted using ffs. pin_num_from_lsb uses
bit_pos value. pins array is populated with:
pin + pin_num_from_lsb.
The above is 1 more than usual bit indices as bit_pos uses ffs to compute
first set bit. Hence the last of the pins array is populated with the MAX
value and not MAX - 1 which causes error when we call pin_request.
mask_pos is rightly calculated as ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1))
Consequently val_pos and submask are correct.
Hence use __ffs which gives (ffs(x) - 1) as the first bit set.
fixes: 4e7e8017a8 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins
of different modules")
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Changed pcs->fshift to use __ffs instead of ffs to be consistent.
Boot tesed on da850-evm and checked the pinctrl sysfs nodes.
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index fb126d5..cf9bafa 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct
pcs_device *pcs,
/* Parse pins in each row from LSB */
while (mask) {
- bit_pos = ffs(mask);
+ bit_pos = __ffs(mask);
pin_num_from_lsb = bit_pos / pcs->bits_per_pin;
- mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1));
+ mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << bit_pos);
val_pos = val & mask_pos;
submask = mask & mask_pos;
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "pinctrl-single,function-mask",
&pcs->fmask);
if (!ret) {
- pcs->fshift = ffs(pcs->fmask) - 1;
+ pcs->fshift = __ffs(pcs->fmask);
pcs->fmax = pcs->fmask >> pcs->fshift;
} else {
/* If mask property doesn't exist, function mux is invalid. */
--
1.9.1
