On 04/15/2016 05:48 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
On 4/14/2016 9:35 PM, David Lechner wrote:
Device tree binding for new phy-da8xx-usb driver.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
v4 changes:
* swapped order of usb20 and usb11 to be in logical order of reg address.
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt | 40
++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bead185
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+TI DaVinci DA8xx USB PHY
DA8xx is not DaVinci, please omit this.
Just to be sure, you mean omit "DaVinci"?
+
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: must be "ti,da830-usbphy".
+ - #phy-cells: must be 1.
+
+This device controls the PHY for both the USB 1.1 OHCI and USB 2.0 OTG
+controllers on DA8xx SoCs. Consumers of this device should use index
0 for
+the USB 2.0 phy device and index 1 for the USB 1.1 phy device.
Not indices 2 and 1 already?
I changed this to reflect the TRM. USB0PHY = USB 2.0 and USB1PHY = USB 1.1
+ usbphy: usbphy {
Name it "usb-phy" please, consistent to what ePAPR has mandated for
Ethernet PHYs.
Ack.
