On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:39:32PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > > @@ -265,6 +265,93 @@
> > > compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc";
> > > reg = <0x00000008 0x0c000000 0 0x40>, /* MC portal
> > > base */
> > > <0x00000000 0x08340000 0 0x40000>; /* MC control
> > > reg */
> > > + msi-parent = <&its>;
> > > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Region type 0x0 - MC portals
> > > + * Region type 0x1 - QBMAN portals
> > > + */
> > > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x0c000000 0x4000000
> > > + 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x18000000 0x8000000>;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Define the maximum number of MACs present on the SoC.
> > > + * They won't necessarily be all probed, since the
> > > + * Data Path Layout file and the MC firmware can put
> > > + * fewer actual DPMAC objects on the MC bus.
> > > + */
> > > + dpmacs {
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + dpmac1: dpmac@1 {
> > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> >
> > I did not see how this compatible is used by kernel driver.
>
> There is no driver yet, but it will be coming soon. But, does
> it matter? Device trees should be describing hardware
> without regards to some specific kernel use of a node or
> property.
We need to at least have the bindings documented before we can accept it
in dts files.
Shawn
