4.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
[ Upstream commit 04761890a7cec6a1ff9aafd909004da4fe8059db ]
The initial commit badly merged into the dsa_resume method instead
of the dsa_remove_dst method.
As consequence, the dst->master_netdev->dsa_ptr is not set to NULL on
removal and re-bind of the dsa device fails with error -17.
Fixes: b0dc635d923c ("net: dsa: cleanup resources upon module removal ")
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -935,6 +935,14 @@ static void dsa_remove_dst(struct dsa_sw
{
int i;
+ dst->master_netdev->dsa_ptr = NULL;
+
+ /* If we used a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
+ * field, make sure that all packets from this point get sent
+ * without the tag and go through the regular receive path.
+ */
+ wmb();
+
for (i = 0; i < dst->pd->nr_chips; i++) {
struct dsa_switch *ds = dst->ds[i];
@@ -988,14 +996,6 @@ static int dsa_suspend(struct device *d)
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
int i, ret = 0;
- dst->master_netdev->dsa_ptr = NULL;
-
- /* If we used a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
- * field, make sure that all packets from this point get sent
- * without the tag and go through the regular receive path.
- */
- wmb();
-
for (i = 0; i < dst->pd->nr_chips; i++) {
struct dsa_switch *ds = dst->ds[i];
