On Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:00 am, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it > > > serves any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the > > > sysfs hierarchy (not to mention lspci will tell you). The > > > cpuaffinity file should be moved from the bus to the device -- it > > > really doesn't make any sense to talk about which cpu a bus is > > > affine to, only a device. > > > > It doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose other than the affinity > > now, but I still think that it conceptually belongs there, because > > it makes sense to have per-bus attributes. For example, in the > > future we could show data width and signalling speed. > > So, if it were to stay, where in the tree should it be? Hanging off > of the pci device that is the bridge? Or just placing these files > within the pci device directory itself, as it is the bridge. > > There are also some "legacy io" binary sysfs files in these > directories for those platforms that support it (#ifdef > HAVE_PCI_LEGACY), and I'm guessing that there is some user for them > out there, otherwise they would not have been added... > > Hm, only ia64 enables that option. Matthew, do you care about those > files?
Those interfaces could be supported on other platforms (iirc benh has been planning to add legacy_* support to ppc for awhile). It would be great if they were supported everywhere to provide userspace with a fairly sane way to get at this stuff on all Linux systems... Should be trivial on i386 I think. Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/