Yes, it is. Certainly happened while editing patches (sorry about that), will be fixed on next iteration once I get a bit more feedback.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:03:12PM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote: >> +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN) >> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = KASAN_SHADOW_START; >> +#elfif defined(CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64) >> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR; >> +#elfif defined(CONFIG_EFI) >> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = EFI_VA_START; >> +#else >> +static const unsigned long memory_rand_end = __START_KERNEL_map; >> +#endif > > That #elfif is a typo, right? > > > Joerg >
