On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 11:14 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote: > [..] > > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch > > > set? > > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the > > async/thread functionality as possible into a separate file. > hm, we are talking about some 50-60 lines of code in total (seems > that the patch set adds more comments than code), but your point > is interesting. let's say, if there will be more opinions that it > better land in async_printk.{c,h} files, then I'll take a look on > it. how does it sound?
I think printk.c is pretty large, complicated and should be broken up into several bits. I did that once, but it's a real development timing issue https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/17/41 cheers, Joe