A line incrementing the re variable was indented a level too deep in
ieee754dp_mul, making the code unclear to read. Fix the indentation.
This appears to have been copied verbatim along with the rest of the
multiplication code to ieee754dp_maddf, now _dp_maddf, too so fix the
indentation there too.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <[email protected]>
---

 arch/mips/math-emu/dp_maddf.c | 2 +-
 arch/mips/math-emu/dp_mul.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_maddf.c b/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_maddf.c
index dc83fdd..4a2d03c 100644
--- a/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_maddf.c
+++ b/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_maddf.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static union ieee754dp _dp_maddf(union ieee754dp z, union 
ieee754dp x,
        if ((s64) rm < 0) {
                rm = (rm >> (64 - (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3))) |
                     ((rm << (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3)) != 0);
-                       re++;
+               re++;
        } else {
                rm = (rm >> (64 - (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3 + 1))) |
                     ((rm << (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3 + 1)) != 0);
diff --git a/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_mul.c b/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_mul.c
index d6a7573..87d0b44 100644
--- a/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_mul.c
+++ b/arch/mips/math-emu/dp_mul.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ union ieee754dp ieee754dp_mul(union ieee754dp x, union 
ieee754dp y)
        if ((s64) rm < 0) {
                rm = (rm >> (64 - (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3))) |
                     ((rm << (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3)) != 0);
-                       re++;
+               re++;
        } else {
                rm = (rm >> (64 - (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3 + 1))) |
                     ((rm << (DP_FBITS + 1 + 3 + 1)) != 0);
-- 
2.8.0

Reply via email to