On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200 Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz: > > So we're good ? > > I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2. > As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you can give an Acked-by ? > > Whose tree can carry these patches ? > > (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.) > > What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low. > Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and PowerPC :) KVM maintainers... Thanks anyway for your valuable help ! Cheers. -- Greg
