Hello, Petr. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:14:19PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > My intention is to make it easier to manipulate and maintain kthreads. > Especially, I want to replace all the custom main cycles with a > generic one. Also I want to make the kthreads sleep in a consistent > state in a common place when there is no work. > > My first attempt was with a brand new API (iterant kthread), see > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.api/11892 . But I was > directed to improve the existing kthread worker API. This is > the 4th iteration of the new direction. > > 1nd..10th patches: improve the existing kthread worker API
I glanced over them and they generally look good to me. Let's see how people respond to actual conversions. Thanks. -- tejun
