On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 00:39 +0100, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Sunil and Ingo, > > Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago) > > 2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say > > 2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt > > patch? > > > > If yes, any reason why we need to apply rt patch only to a base kernel? > > according to my observation 2.6.19-rt15 is based/includes 2.6.19.1 changes. > > But there has been that nasty clear_page_dirty_for_io() bug causing > corruption of ext3. Even that I have tested more 2.6.20-rc + rt,
> I preffer > to stay on "stable" kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable > appears. This is a very weird statement, the -rt kernel includes so much experimental work it cannot be called 'stable' by a long shot. Sure its not known unstable, but neither is .20-rc5. If you want -rt, just run with the latest unless you have a very specific need not to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/