On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3194ac6e66cc ("arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier.")
>
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
>
> 3915fea959b6 ("ARM: XEN: Move xen_early_init() before efi_init()")
>
> from the xen-tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks Stephen, looks good to me.
Will
> diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index 65f515949baa,7cf992fe6684..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@@ -277,13 -336,13 +278,11 @@@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p
>
> early_ioremap_reset();
>
> - if (acpi_disabled) {
> - unflatten_device_tree();
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> psci_dt_init();
> - } else {
> + else
> psci_acpi_init();
> - }
>
> - xen_early_init();
> -
> cpu_read_bootcpu_ops();
> smp_init_cpus();
> smp_build_mpidr_hash();
>
