> Even 2.2.x can be fixed to do the wake-one for accept(), if required. Do we really want to retrofit wake_one to 2.2. I know Im not terribly keen to try and backport all the mechanism. I think for 2.2 using the semaphore is a good approach. Its a hack to fix an old OS kernel. For 2.4 its not needed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_k... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of l... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by remo... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalabilit... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalab... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by remo... dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by remo... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalabilit... dean gaudet