> There are three different fixes:
> 1. Fix for THRE errata

That should be handled anyway. The current code actually spots this and
uses a backup timer for dodgy UARTS

> 2. Fix for Busy Detect on LCR write
> 3. Workaround for interrupt/data concurrency issue

>       case UPIO_MEM:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
> +             /* Save the LCR value so it can be re-written when a
> +              * Busy Detect interrupt occurs. */
> +             if (dwapb_offset == UART_LCR)
> +                     up->dwapb_lcr = value;
> +#endif
>               writeb(value, up->port.membase + offset);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
> +             /* Re-read the IER to ensure any interrupt disabling has
> +              * completed before proceeding with ISR. */
> +             if (dwapb_offset == UART_IER)
> +                     value = serial_in(up, dwapb_offset);
> +#endif
>               break;

This I would hope you can hide in the platform specific
serial_in/serial_out functions. If you write the UART_LCR save it in
serial_out(), if you read IER etc.


> +#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
> +             } else if ((iir & UART_IER_BUSY) == UART_IER_BUSY) {
> +                     /*
> +                      * The MSP (DesignWare APB UART) serial subsystem has a
> +                      * non-standard interrupt condition (0x7) which means
> +                      * that the LCR was written while the UART was busy, so
> +                      * the LCR was not actually written.  It is cleared by
> +                      * reading the special non-standard extended UART status
> +                      * register.

Ditto... spot this case and whack it in your serial methods.


And we might want to add a void * for board specific insanity to the 8250
structures if we really have to so you can hang your brain damage
privately off that ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to