On (04/28/16 05:13), Dan Streetman wrote: > Instead of using "zswap" as the name for all zpools created, add > an atomic counter and use "zswap%x" with the counter number for each > zpool created, to provide a unique name for each new zpool. > > As zsmalloc, one of the zpool implementations, requires/expects a > unique name for each pool created, zswap should provide a unique name. > The zsmalloc pool creation does not fail if a new pool with a > conflicting name is created, unless CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT is enabled; > in that case, zsmalloc pool creation fails with -ENOMEM. Then zswap > will be unable to change its compressor parameter if its zpool is > zsmalloc; it also will be unable to change its zpool parameter back > to zsmalloc, if it has any existing old zpool using zsmalloc with > page(s) in it. Attempts to change the parameters will result in > failure to create the zpool. This changes zswap to provide a > unique name for each zpool creation. > > Fixes: f1c54846ee45 ("zswap: dynamic pool creation") > Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> > Cc: Dan Streetman <dan.street...@canonical.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstr...@ieee.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> -ss