Björn Steinbrink wrote:
Hm, I don't think it is unhappy about looking at NV_INT_STATUS_CK804.
I'm running 2.6.20-rc5 with the INT_DEV check removed for 8 hours now
without a single problem and that should still look at
NV_INT_STATUS_CK804, right?
I just noticed that my last email might not have been clear enough. The
exceptions happened when I re-enabled the return statement in addition
to the debug message. Without the INT_DEV check, it is completely fine
AFAICT.

Indeed, it seems to be just the NV_INT_DEV check that is problematic. Here's a patch that's likely better to test, it forces the NV_INT_DEV flag on when a command is active, and also fixes that questionable code in nv_host_intr that I mentioned.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

--- linux-2.6.20-rc5/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c      2007-01-19 19:18:53.000000000 
-0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc5debug/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c 2007-01-22 22:33:43.000000000 
-0600
@@ -700,7 +700,6 @@ static void nv_adma_check_cpb(struct ata
 static int nv_host_intr(struct ata_port *ap, u8 irq_stat)
 {
        struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->active_tag);
-       int handled;
 
        /* freeze if hotplugged */
        if (unlikely(irq_stat & (NV_INT_ADDED | NV_INT_REMOVED))) {
@@ -719,13 +718,7 @@ static int nv_host_intr(struct ata_port 
        }
 
        /* handle interrupt */
-       handled = ata_host_intr(ap, qc);
-       if (unlikely(!handled)) {
-               /* spurious, clear it */
-               ata_check_status(ap);
-       }
-
-       return 1;
+       return ata_host_intr(ap, qc);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t nv_adma_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
@@ -752,6 +745,11 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_adma_interrupt(int
                        if (pp->flags & NV_ADMA_PORT_REGISTER_MODE) {
                                u8 irq_stat = readb(host->mmio_base + 
NV_INT_STATUS_CK804)
                                        >> (NV_INT_PORT_SHIFT * i);
+                               if(ata_tag_valid(ap->active_tag))
+                                       /** NV_INT_DEV indication seems 
unreliable at times
+                                           at least in ADMA mode. Force it on 
always when a
+                                           command is active, to prevent 
losing interrupts. */
+                                       irq_stat |= NV_INT_DEV;
                                handled += nv_host_intr(ap, irq_stat);
                                continue;
                        }

Reply via email to