Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:56:38PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Russell, >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> > [didn't read most of your reply] >> > >> >> Really I just reposted it several times because I notice that you seem >> >> to ignore many points of my emails. I was really hoping to get you to >> >> address this point. I notice that you still didn't. Either you are >> >> just trying to annoy me, or you don't have an answer to how my patch >> >> series hurts you. >> > >> > I don't see you treating Rob with the same contempt that you have >> > treated me in this thread, despite Rob and myself both telling you >> > basically the same thing. >> >> Rob wrote a nice thoughtful reply and I tried to give a nice >> thoughtful reply back to him. He raised some good points and I raised >> some good points back to him. I look forward to his future thoughts >> on the topic. > > Meanwhile, I've pointed out that you appear to be coming from a > misunderstanding (that's certainly clear because you believed > initially that grub did something it doesn't), showing that the > "problem" you have is no different from the majority of other > systems running Linux, and you treat me with contempt. > > What are you going to do to resolve this?
As I tried to indicate in earlier emails, I don't actually care how grub works in this case. It was originally meant to illustrate the other people's workflows and mine are not the same. If they have a solution that works for them, that's great. I want my MMC and MMCBLK device numbers to be sane and consistent to help me parse through dmesg and sysfs. If it happens to also make it easy / possible to specify a root filesystem using "mmcblkN" that's great and I'll probably take advantage of that. I'm very sorry if those using SATA and ATA disks don't have a way to get sane and consistent device number ordering. I really am. ...but just because they don't have a well defined ordering doesn't mean those of us using MMC should have to suffer. ...and I don't think giving a sane ordering to MMC devices hurts anyone, does it? -Doug