On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function > > in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset() > > and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper. > > Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?
This was done against linux-next. But now I have just rebased against the charmisc tree and sent v2. Also added the Reviewed-by tag to it. (hope thats ok) regards sudip
