4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

commit c0b5eed110dcf520aadafefbcc40658cbdd18b95 upstream.

It's better to set the continueSession attribute for the unseal
operation so that the session object is not removed as a side-effect
when the operation is successful. Since a user process created the
session, it should be also decide when the session is destroyed.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Fixes: 5beb0c435b ("keys, trusted: seal with a TPM2 authorization policy")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c |   10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
@@ -20,7 +20,11 @@
 #include <keys/trusted-type.h>
 
 enum tpm2_object_attributes {
-       TPM2_ATTR_USER_WITH_AUTH        = BIT(6),
+       TPM2_OA_USER_WITH_AUTH          = BIT(6),
+};
+
+enum tpm2_session_attributes {
+       TPM2_SA_CONTINUE_SESSION        = BIT(0),
 };
 
 struct tpm2_startup_in {
@@ -489,7 +493,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *c
                tpm_buf_append(&buf, options->policydigest,
                               options->policydigest_len);
        } else {
-               tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_ATTR_USER_WITH_AUTH);
+               tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_OA_USER_WITH_AUTH);
                tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, 0);
        }
 
@@ -627,7 +631,7 @@ static int tpm2_unseal(struct tpm_chip *
                             options->policyhandle ?
                             options->policyhandle : TPM2_RS_PW,
                             NULL /* nonce */, 0,
-                            0 /* session_attributes */,
+                            TPM2_SA_CONTINUE_SESSION,
                             options->blobauth /* hmac */,
                             TPM_DIGEST_SIZE);
 


Reply via email to