4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>

commit 56b367c0cd67d4c3006738e7dc9dda9273fd2bfe upstream.

pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry uses ffs which gives bit indices
ranging from 1 to MAX. This leads to a corner case where we try to request
the pin number = MAX and fails.

bit_pos value is being calculted using ffs. pin_num_from_lsb uses
bit_pos value. pins array is populated with:

pin + pin_num_from_lsb.

The above is 1 more than usual bit indices as bit_pos uses ffs to compute
first set bit. Hence the last of the pins array is populated with the MAX
value and not MAX - 1 which causes error when we call pin_request.

mask_pos is rightly calculated as ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1))
Consequently val_pos and submask are correct.

Hence use __ffs which gives (ffs(x) - 1) as the first bit set.

fixes: 4e7e8017a8 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins 
of different modules")
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1273,9 +1273,9 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_ent
 
                /* Parse pins in each row from LSB */
                while (mask) {
-                       bit_pos = ffs(mask);
+                       bit_pos = __ffs(mask);
                        pin_num_from_lsb = bit_pos / pcs->bits_per_pin;
-                       mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1));
+                       mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << bit_pos);
                        val_pos = val & mask_pos;
                        submask = mask & mask_pos;
 
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_dev
        ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "pinctrl-single,function-mask",
                                   &pcs->fmask);
        if (!ret) {
-               pcs->fshift = ffs(pcs->fmask) - 1;
+               pcs->fshift = __ffs(pcs->fmask);
                pcs->fmax = pcs->fmask >> pcs->fshift;
        } else {
                /* If mask property doesn't exist, function mux is invalid. */


Reply via email to