* J.D. Schroeder <[email protected]> [160503 10:50]: > On 05/03/2016 12:32 PM, Tero Kristo wrote: > > Personally I would not recommend using this clock for any timing sensitive > > applications. May I ask why you are interested in the exact clock rate of > > this > > clock anyway? > > I'm not interested in using this clock and I'm not sure how anyone would use > this clock outside of the processor. See the inline comment that is part of > the change and the commit message for the change. There is no hint in my > change that this is an exact clock rate. It is a clarifying change to help > others avoid using this clock as a 32 kHz clock (which the current clock name > and frequency imply) and it more accurately represents the actual hardware > behavior.
Well if it's inaccurate, how about we just add comments to the clock? Tony
