On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:37 -0700, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> Hi Grant ! >> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote: >> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: >> > >Ah, think I see the problem now: >> > > >> > >--- kernel-source-2.4.27.orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 >> > >17:53:57.247695476 -0700 >> > >+++ kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 17:49:07.480161733 >> > >-0700 >> > >@@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ >> > > fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->dir_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | >> > > S_IRWXO)) | S_IFDIR; >> > > else if ( (server->mnt->flags & SMB_MOUNT_FMODE) && >> > > !(S_ISDIR(fattr->f_mode)) ) >> > >- fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | >> > >S_IRWXO)) | S_IFREG; >> > >+ fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | >> > >S_IRWXO)) | (fattr->f_mode & S_IFMT); >> > > >> > > } >> > > >> > client running 2.4.34 with above patch, server is running 2.6.19.2 to >> > eliminate it from the problem space (hopefully ;) : >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ uname -r >> > 2.4.34b >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ ls -l >> > total 9 >> > drwxr-xr-x 1 grant wheel 4096 2007-01-21 11:44 dir/ >> > drwxr-xr-x 1 grant wheel 4096 2007-01-21 11:44 dirlink/ >> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 grant wheel 15 2007-01-21 11:43 file* >> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 grant wheel 15 2007-01-21 11:43 filelink* >> >> It seems to me that there is a difference, because filelink now appears the >> same size as file. It's just as if we had hard links instead of symlinks. > >I was running into this yesterday - turns out that Debian's current >smbfs package contains a patch that checks for user passed options, >and disables unix capabilities in that case. It was added in >3.0.14a-4. I've filed a bug requesting the removal of this patch: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=408033 > >Grant: Do you know if are you running a version of smbfs w/ this > patch? Hi Dann, I'm running slackware-11, no smbfs package, 'smbmnt' is from samba-3.0.23c package with two tiny unrelated (?) patches: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mirror/slackware-11.0/source$ find . -name samba* ./n/samba ./n/samba/samba.cups.diff.gz ./n/samba/samba.ssl.diff.gz ./n/samba/samba.SlackBuild ./n/samba/samba-3.0.23c.tar.asc ./n/samba/samba-3.0.23c.tar.bz2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mirror/slackware-11.0/source$ zless n/samba/samba.cups.diff.gz --- ./source/configure.orig 2002-10-23 18:06:43.000000000 -0700 +++ ./source/configure 2002-10-23 18:07:12.000000000 -0700 @@ -3789,7 +3789,7 @@ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS `$CUPS_CONFIG --cflags`" LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS `$CUPS_CONFIG --ldflags`" - LIBS="$LIBS `$CUPS_CONFIG --libs`" + LIBS="-lcrypt $LIBS `$CUPS_CONFIG --libs`" fi fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mirror/slackware-11.0/source$ zcat n/samba/samba.ssl.diff.gz --- ./source/configure.orig 2002-10-09 13:27:21.000000000 -0700 +++ ./source/configure 2002-10-23 18:06:43.000000000 -0700 @@ -12479,7 +12479,7 @@ fi - LIBS="-lssl -lcrypto $LIBS" + LIBS="$LIBS -lssl -lcrypto" # if test ! -d ${withval}; then # echo "configure: error: called with --with-ssl, but ssl base directory ${withval} does not exist or is not a directory. Aborting config" 1>&2 Grant. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/