On Thursday, May 05, 2016 05:25:19 PM Steve Muckle wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:09:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > In turn, schedutil should probably depend on CONFIG_SMP. > > In the long term I wonder if it's worth putting PELT under its own > separate feature or just removing #ifdef CONFIG_SMP. > > Aside from task migration CPU frequency updates there's also task > creation and deletion which would apply on UP. The tunable > infrastructure being created for scheduler-guided frequency may be of > interest on UP also.
I agree, but I was talking short-term. :-) We need to fix this for 4.6 (which most likely is 2 weeks away only) and I don't think it hurts anyone if schedutil depends on CONFIG_SMP to start with.