On May 06, 2016, 13:03, Mark Brown wrote: > > This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was > > added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I > > assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark. > > Yes. The ID patch should have been the first one here, put the simple > stuff first.
In my mind it makes sense to only add this after support to use it is in place in the driver, hence the ordering.
