On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 29, 2016 04:08:16 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: ... > > Any clue, why we don't have a non-SMP version of irq_work_queue_on(), Which > > can > > simply call irq_work_queue() ? > > Because nobody else needs it? > > But I agree that it would be nicer to add the stub to irq_work.h.
I had wondered the same myself and figured there had to be a good reason why it didn't exist. But if not, and it's preferred to add it, I'll go ahead and so.
