On Fri, 06 May 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 05 May 06:29 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote: > > > - of_rproc_byindex(): look-up and obtain a reference to a rproc > > using the DT phandle "rprocs" and a index. > > > > - of_rproc_byname(): lookup and obtain a reference to a rproc > > using the DT phandle "rprocs" and "rproc-names". > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > --- > > I like the idea of having these helpers, but we already have > rproc_get_by_phandle() so these helpers should be built upon that rather > than adding the additional list.
Since this is a framework consideration, don't you think it would be better to standardise the phandle name? This is common practice when coding at a subsystem level. Some in use examples include; "clocks", "power-domains", "mboxes", "dmas", "phys", "resets", "gpios", etc. Considering the aforementioned examples, I figured "rprocs" would be suitable. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
