Thanks Eric!
On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com> writes:
On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
robert.f...@collabora.com writes:
From: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
update pending.
Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
* - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
* an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
* of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
* Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
* synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
* commit in that case.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any
other KMS folks to catch anything.
I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch.
Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)