On 4 Nov 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Indeed, shared memory performance still sucks rocks.
>
> No, it's not a performance problem. It is a hard lockup problem on
> highmem machines.
>
> I do see two problems here:
> 1) shm_swap_core does not handle the failure of prepare_higmem_swapout
> right and basically cannot do so. It gets called zone independant
> and should probably get called per zone. At least it has to react:
AFAIC try_to_swap_out can handle this situation fine, it
shouldn't be very difficult to get shm_swap to handle it
too...
Unfortunately I don't have a really big memory machine so
I cannot test this stuff :(
> You see: you only have 5+27+27=59 pages under your control...
Ughhhh. Maybe we need some rebalancing there as well.
That's a maximum of 5 pages of executable text mapped
into all processes...
regards,
Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
