Em Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > if (csv_output) {
> > > > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%.2f%s" : "%.0f%s";
> > > > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%.2f%s" : "%.0f%s";
> > > > } else {
> > > > if (big_num)
> > > > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%'18.2f%s" : "%'18.0f%s";
> > > > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%'18.2f%s" :
> > > > "%'18.0f%s";
> > > > else
> > > > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%18.2f%s" : "%18.0f%s";
> > > > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%18.2f%s" : "%18.0f%s";
> > >
> > > how about the rest of the code? we display % also in print_running
> > > and print_noise_pct functions and maybe some place else
> >
> > For those it doesn't matter. In fact it's probably better there
> > to always show the fractions.
> >
> > It is just confusing for metrics.
>
> ok, let's try and see, we can always follow up
> with the rest if there's a need
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Missed this one, applied.
- Arnaldo
