On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 00:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> One of the if () statements in intel_pstate_set_policy() causes
> another if () to be evaluated if the condition is true and it
> doesn't do anything else, so merge the two if () statements into
> one.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
    Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1449,12 +1449,11 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
>       intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
>  
>       cpu = all_cpu_data[0];
> -     if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu-
> >pstate.max_pstate) {
> -             if (policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
> -                 policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling) {
> -                     pr_debug("policy->max > max non turbo
> frequency\n");
> -                     policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> -             }
> +     if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate 
> &&
> +         policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
> +         policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling) {
> +             pr_debug("policy->max > max non turbo frequency\n");
> +             policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>       }
>  
>       if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
> in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to