On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:46:56PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:52:32 +0200 > > Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > > >> This reverts the earlier fix attempt and works around the problem > >> by including both linux/mmu_context.h and asm/mmu_context.h from > >> kernel/sched/core.c. This is not a good solution but seems less > >> hacky than the alternatives. > > > > What about simply not compiling finish_arch_post_lock_switch() when > > building modules? > > > > (untested, not compiled or anything) > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> > > --- > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > index fa5b42d44985..3f22d1b6bac8 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct > > mm_struct *mm, > > cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm); > > } > > > > +#ifndef MODULE > > #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \ > > finish_arch_post_lock_switch > > static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void) > > @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void) > > preempt_enable_no_resched(); > > } > > } > > +#endif /* !MODULE */ > > > > #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */ > > > > > Can someone in arm land ack this so Ingo can apply it?
Sorry, I'm simply unable to read every message that comes in. Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk> -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.