On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote: > [..] >> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with >> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late >> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I >> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)? >> >> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that >> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send >> a pull request with the merge to davem. >> > > Hi David, > > In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge > conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the > arm-soc trees. > > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the > Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid > the merge conflict. > > Regards, > Bjorn > > The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771: > > udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device > (2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400)
OK. The contents look good to me. Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gr...@linaro.org>
