Hi David, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:28:28 -0400 > >> Hi David, >> >> Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> writes: >> >>> Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there >>> is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code. >>> Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code. >>> >>> This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the >>> bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled >>> before restoring the Forwarding state. >>> >>> As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port >>> which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition. >>> >>> Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request >>> attr_set as deferred") >>> Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> >>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> >> >> This patch doesn't apply to -net, only applies to net-next... >> >> How should I handle that, do I resend a patch for net-next with the good >> subject prefix, and a v2 for -net? > > I applied this to net-next, thanks. Do we want to send this fix to -net as well? Thanks, Vivien