On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 01:52:24PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote: > Alan, > > Perhaps I did not explain myself, or perhaps I misunderstand your > comments. I was responding to a comment that we could just copy some of > the optimizations from Pro64 over into gcc. That's hard to do, because the whole gcc has copyright assigned to FSF, which means that either gcc steering committee would have to make an exception from this for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some code to FSF. Jakub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jeff Garzik
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-... Aaron Sethman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? Ion Badulescu
- Re: non-gcc linux? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker