On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:35:40PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 5/18/2016 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > >That seems to miss a whole bunch of exceptions... what up? > > We only need to do an explicit call in the case where the exception does NOT > result in a signal, since a signal is something that will be really obvious to > the application in any case. So it's just stuff like handled page faults, > handled bounds checks for x86, handled unaligned load/store for tilegx, etc. Right; as per your earlier signal explanation. This seems somewhat fragile to maintain though and really could use more clarification.
