On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:11:22PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Provide an implementation of atomic_inc_short() using ISO atomics.
It seems entirely unused though; so maybe remove it instead?
- [RFC PATCH 04/15] Convert 32-bit ISO atomics into a templ... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 07/15] Provide cmpxchg(), xchg(), xadd() and _... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 14/15] x86: Make the mutex implementation use ... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 09/15] Make the ISO bitops use 32-bit values i... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 12/15] x86: Use ISO xchg(), cmpxchg() and frie... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 13/15] x86: Improve spinlocks using ISO C++11 ... David Howells
- Re: [RFC PATCH 13/15] x86: Improve spinlocks using I... Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC PATCH 08/15] Provide an implementation of bitops usi... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 10/15] x86: Use ISO atomics David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 06/15] Provide 16-bit ISO atomics David Howells
- Re: [RFC PATCH 06/15] Provide 16-bit ISO atomics Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC PATCH 11/15] x86: Use ISO bitops David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 05/15] Provide atomic64_t and atomic_long_t us... David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix misc cmpxchg() and atomic_cmpx... David Howells
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Provide atomics and bitops implemen... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Provide atomics and bitops implemen... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Provide atomics and bitops implemen... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Provide atomics and bitops implemen... Paul E. McKenney
