On 19.5.2016 19:23, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 05/19/2016 02:11 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> On 05/19/2016 01:58 PM, Chen Feng wrote:
>>>> While testing the kcompactd in my platform 3G MEM only DMA ZONE.
>>>> I found the kcompactd never wakeup. It seems the zoneindex
>>>> has already minus 1 before. So the traverse here should be <=.
>>>
>>> Ouch, thanks!
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Feng <puck.c...@hisilicon.com>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0f87baf4f7fb ("mm: wake kcompactd before kswapd's short sleep")
>>
>> Bah, not that one.
>>
>> Fixes: accf62422b3a ("mm, kswapd: replace kswapd compaction with waking
>> up kcompactd")
>>
>>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
>>> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>>> index 8fa2540..e5122d9 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>>> @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static bool kcompactd_node_suitable(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>>>> struct zone *zone;
>>>> enum zone_type classzone_idx = pgdat->kcompactd_classzone_idx;
>>>>
>>>> - for (zoneid = 0; zoneid < classzone_idx; zoneid++) {
>>>> + for (zoneid = 0; zoneid <= classzone_idx; zoneid++) {
>>>> zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zoneid];
>>>>
>>>> if (!populated_zone(zone))
>
> Ignorant question: kcompactd_do_work() just below has a similar loop:
You spelled "Important" wrong.
> should that one be saying "zoneid <= cc.classzone_idx" too?
Yes. Chen, can you send updated patch (also with the ack/cc/fixes tags I added?)
Thanks!
> Hugh
>
