> hi,
> we already have similar output for aggregated counters,
> could you please consider something like below to clearly
> separate them?
I think Arnaldo has already merged the patch, so he should merge
the fix too. The fix is fine for me.
-Andi
>
> [root@ibm-x3650m4-01 perf]# ./perf stat -e cycles -I 1000 -vv -a -C 0,1
> ...
> cycles: CPU 0: 1298783264 1000126956 1000126956
> cycles: CPU 1: 1298791660 1000134589 1000134589
> cycles: AGGR: 2597574924 2000261545 2000261545
> ...
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 7c5c50b61b28..bd0d67ebb757 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int read_counter(struct perf_evsel *counter)
>
> if (verbose > 1) {
> fprintf(stat_config.output,
> - "%s: %d: %" PRIu64 " %" PRIu64 " %"
> PRIu64 "\n",
> + "%s: CPU %d: %" PRIu64 " %" PRIu64 " %"
> PRIu64 "\n",
> perf_evsel__name(counter),
> cpu,
> count->val, count->ena,
> count->run);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index c1ba255f2abe..5ddeea1399ee 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ int perf_stat_process_counter(struct perf_stat_config
> *config,
> update_stats(&ps->res_stats[i], count[i]);
>
> if (verbose) {
> - fprintf(config->output, "%s: %" PRIu64 " %" PRIu64 " %" PRIu64
> "\n",
> + fprintf(config->output, "%s: AGGR: %" PRIu64 " %" PRIu64 " %"
> PRIu64 "\n",
> perf_evsel__name(counter), count[0], count[1],
> count[2]);
> }
>
>
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
