On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:48:48AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Are there any comments on this version of the patchset? I thought we had > reached an agreement that the underlying feature (allowing a process to > manage its own cgroups) was useful. Is there a better way of solving this > problem, that I don't know of?
I still don't see why this is necessary. Delegation is done through chmodding. There's no reason to deviate for namespaces. Thanks. -- tejun
