On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:20 AM, William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll submit patches to resolve these warnings and errors.
No. I will disable that ISA config option. We're not randomly making old drivers available on modern platforms. Really. We're not suddenly enabling ISA on x86-64 after having successfully gotten rid of that insane crap long long ago. If you have *specific* dribvers that are actually relevant for some reason, make those ones available based on other options. For example, we've had the ISA_DMA_API config option to say "we support a subset of ISA, even when we don't actually want to ever see actual plug-in ISA cards". Your patch already resulted in having to add several cases of - depends on ISA + depends on X86 && ISA because you tried to randomly widen what "ISA" meant. No. No no no. No more "let's randomly change what ISA is". Do this enabling one driver at a time, or not at all. I'm not at all interested in seeing some kind of generic "we will support random shit on modern platfoms" crap. 99% of all drivers that depend on ISA have no maintainership, and will never get any maintainership. Linus