Hi Geert,

Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016, 11:05:42 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Submitters of device tree binding documentation may forget to CC
> the subsystem maintainer if this is missing.

The "N: rockchip" line at the bottom of the block catches this nicely 
already (also just verified with a get_maintainer.pl -f call), so I don't 
think this new more explicit line is really necessary?


Thanks
Heiko


> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-rockc...@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> Please apply this patch directly if you want to be involved in device
> tree binding documentation for your subsystem.
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index ea4e25a2f188aca1..e6b84eba4d574d13 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1577,6 +1577,7 @@ L:      linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated
> for non-subscribers) L:       linux-rockc...@lists.infradead.org
>  T:   git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git
> S:    Maintained
> +F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/
>  F:   arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3*
>  F:   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/
>  F:   drivers/clk/rockchip/

Reply via email to