On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -405,37 +405,29 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
>   * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
>   *
>   * rax: prev task we switched from
> + * rbx: kernel thread func
> + * r12: kernel thread arg
>   */
>  ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
>       movq    %rax, %rdi
>       call    schedule_tail                   /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>  
> -     testb   $3, CS(%rsp)                    /* from kernel_thread? */
> +     testq   %rbx, %rbx                      /* from kernel_thread? */
>       jnz     1f
>  
> -     /*
> -      * We came from kernel_thread.  This code path is quite twisted, and
> -      * someone should clean it up.
> -      *
> -      * copy_thread_tls stashes the function pointer in RBX and the
> -      * parameter to be passed in RBP.  The called function is permitted
> -      * to call do_execve and thereby jump to user mode.
> -      */
> -     movq    RBP(%rsp), %rdi
> -     call    *RBX(%rsp)
> -     movq    %rax, RAX(%rsp)
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Fall through as though we're exiting a syscall.  This makes a
> -      * twisted sort of sense if we just called do_execve.
> -      */
> -
> -1:
> +2:
>       movq    %rsp, %rdi
>       call    syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
>       TRACE_IRQS_ON                   /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
>       SWAPGS
>       jmp     restore_regs_and_iret
> +
> +1:
> +     /* kernel thread */
> +     movq    %r12, %rdi
> +     call    *%rbx
> +     movq    %rax, RAX(%rsp)
> +     jmp     2b
>  END(ret_from_fork)

It seems really surprising that a kernel thread would be returning to
user space.  It would probably be a good idea to preserve the existing
comments about that.

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to