On 24-05-16, 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I don't really get it why you don't like get/put_online_cpus() so much.
Not that I don't like them, I just wanted to see if its possible to work without any additional locking. Anyway, so the first version of your patch did the get_online_cpus() around a bigger section of the code instead of just the for_each_online_cpu() loop. Should we change that? -- viresh
