On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > What do people think, do we need module persistent storage? Hopefully not. The standard examples (mixer levels, etc) are better handled with a userspace tool hooked by modprobe. This even gets persistence across reboots if that's what's wanted. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- loop device hangs Christian van Enckevort
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.... Keith Owens
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... Russell King
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated... Keith Owens
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Upd... David Woodhouse
- Persistent module storage [was Li... Keith Owens
- Re: Persistent module storag... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storag... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module st... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module st... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module st... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module st... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module st... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module st... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module st... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module st... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module st... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module st... Jeff Garzik