* Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not arguing against an operations based approach. I'm arguing for > simple obviously correct steps, and not throwing the baby out with the > bath water. > > My patches should be a precursor to an operations based approach > because they are simple step from where we are now.
yeah. I'd say your approach is to go from A to B: [A] -----------------------------------------------------> [B] | [C] while there might be some other arguments that "no, lets go to C instead", i say lets not throw away the already implemented and already working and nicely layered [A]->[B] transition, just because there's an argument whether the end result should be 'B' or 'C'. Unless someone who wants to see 'C' produces a patchset that walks the whole way i dont see any reason to not go with your patchset. It clearly removes alot of cruft. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/